Please read this article as I found it a great resource for analyzing art.
There are a few other links attached to this document including a few that show ways you can incorporate technology into your critiques.
After reading some of these, please find at least one link pertaining to adding 21st century skills into art critques and add it as a post below along with how you could use that idea in your classroom. If the idea you want to try is different than your article or link, that’s fine too!
http://www.wetcanvas.com/Articles2/509/168/
“Giving Critique – a Check List for Critiquers”
Page 1 of 2 Author: Henrik_Lindberg, Contributing Editor
| Not quite sure how to give a critique? This article is an attempt to provide some advice. There are two checklists: a positive list for the elements that contribute to a successful work; and a negative list that looks at flaws. Finally, you will find advice on putting it all together including the frame of mind needed for providing a critique. I have tried to keep the lists compact and general while still aiming to explain what is, perhaps, not obvious. The lists should work for both realism and abstract art as they are not based on a set of rules such as “Don’t put the horizon on the middle”. |
| Positive Check List |
|
| Negative Check List |
|
“Giving Critique – a Check List for Critiquers”
Page 2 of 2 Author: Henrik_Lindberg, Contributing Editor
How to give critique Your critique should be divided into two sections: what has been done well and what could be improved. The focus should be on providing feedback that will help the artist – and onlookers – learn something. What has been done well – select a few of the best things and say why you think they work. What could be improved – select areas where the biggest improvements could be made and say why. Suggest ways the improvements could be made and give your reasons. Where appropriate, provide links to relevant examples or reference material. If the artist has chosen to allow digital alternations of their work you may like to provide an edited image to illustrate your points. Don’t
Do
Remember, the artist is seeking constructive feedback on how to improve – both in the work under critique and for their future development. Therefore, your suggested improvements do not have to be corrections that can be easily made. For example, it may not be possible to completely rearrange a watercolor but the artist can incorporate what is learned in future work. When the artwork is exceptionally good, and you can not find any improvements you can instead elaborate on the analysis and point out in more detail what has been done well – this could be more for the benefit of the onlookers than for the artist. Finally, when giving a critique, try to think of yourself as being hired by the artist as a mentor or teacher, or perhaps a defense attorney whose job is to make your client’s work look its best in court (even if it is hideous). If you truly dislike something and really can’t think of anything that would help, it is best to refrain from posting. If the artist has specifically asked for your opinion, perhaps, instead of a critique, you could suggest some exercises, articles, other artwork or reference material to look at. Remember there are plenty of lessons, projects, library images and other material here at WetCanvas! to refer to. |
http://www.muskoka-news.com/MuskokaNews/article/54625
Contact a practicing artist and host an online critique – either in real-time or in a chat based setting.
http://www.f1point0.com/2007/11/02/the-art-of-the-critique/
So, as a public service, and without further ado, here is my humble opinion on how to give a good critique:
- (General) Study the masters of the craft. Learn how they did what they did, and *why*. Learn the techniques, understand the foundations and technical aspects.
- Look at the work as a whole – what was the artist trying to say, what feeling were they trying to convey.
- Look at the specifics – color, composition, light (note this applies equally to all media, not just photography).
- Does the work succeed in it’s intended outcome – ie does it convey what it was meant to convey emotionally and intellectually.
- If no, why not? is there a technical flaw that detracts from it? does the composition not work? do the colors not evoke the proper mood? is the subject not presented well?
- If it *does* succeed is there anything that could have been done better – technically, compositionally, etc…?
- Communicate points 2-6 as precisely as possible – exactly what works and what doesn’t, and *why*. What did you “get” from the piece, and how successful was each aspect in attaining it. For most folks you may want to start with the good points, as they may not be prepared for the apparent harshness of a real critique!
And finally – if you find someone who can give a educated, honest, and constructive critique – hang on to them! They will increase your skills far more than a whole bucket of ego stroking!
http://artsedge.kennedy-center.org/content/3338/
Teaching students to Critique
http://artsedge.kennedy-center.org/content/3932/
Art Critiques Made Easy
Emphasizing the Elements of Art: An art activity Using Microsoft Paint
I found this on The Incredible Art website. It is not the one I actually used, but I believe it would work in some of my art classes. I will fish around and find the site that I told you about.
While the skills needed to create a program like the one mentioned in the article may evade some of us right now, I nevertheless thought that the idea was innovative. Here the instructor has created a gallery of sorts based on student work. Students are guided through the various steps of the critique process. Students then have the ability to “walk through” the gallery and critique one another’s work on a wiki space, making the critique process a much more interactive and interpersonal activity.